Today's film?
Star Trek Into Darkness (87% on Rot Tom, 8.4 on IMDB)
I am no expert on Star Trek. I have watched half of Next Generation and the 2009 movie. Even still, I felt like I understood most of the references (of which there were many). The main difference between the first film and this one was the importance of plot. In 2009, plot was essential. In 2013, not so much.
While it was a thoroughly enjoyable experience, it mostly felt like a long action sequence jam-packed with references. I must mention how the camera enjoyed finding strange and spin-y angles for no comprehensible reason, especially when it came to Benedict Cumberbatch. Seriously, hen Cumberbatch revealed his identity (no spoilers, I promise), the camera GOT ALL UP in his business. Extreme close up simply wasn't extreme enough.
Generally speaking, the fight scenes were beautifully done and you could tell how much the actors were into it. Major props to Zachary Quinto who pretty much stole the show. Watching his bro-mance with Chris Pine was, while a bit Brokeback, a gorgeous sight to behold.
While I wish they had solidified the plot a bit more, I must admit it was crazily entertaining. I give it a 7.5/10 and recommend it for both Trekkies (for the shout-out references and twists only they will understand) and those who know nothing about it. Being somewhere in between, I felt a little out of sorts. However, I did enjoy the final line reversal... Guess you'll have to see it to find out. Not sure if I recommend 3D, but at the end of the day it's all shards of ships flying at your face.
No comments:
Post a Comment